Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Obama breaks another pledge
Friday, February 12, 2010
Fiscal Responsibility
Monday, January 25, 2010
Good to Know that Some Things Never Change
Obama Administration Steers Lucrative No-Bid Contract for Afghan Work to Dem Donor
Labels: corruption, politics
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
America back to a 2 party system
Hopefully now we can get some "Open" debate and bipartisanship going in the Congress and Senate for things like Healthcare reform and Cap and Tax.
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
You're doing a heck of a job Nappy.
Sunday, December 20, 2009
More Government Transparency from the Obama Administration
Civil Rights Panel Subpoenas Justice Department in New Black Panthers Case
- FOXNews.com
The United States Civil Rights Commission, an eight-member agency that investigates accusations of discrimination, has launched its latest offensive against a most unusual target: the Justice Department.
The United States Civil Rights Commission, an eight-member agency that investigates accusations of discrimination, has launched a new offensive against a most unusual target: the Justice Department.
The commission is investigating why the Justice Department dropped charges in May against three members of the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense in a voter intimidation case that the government won.
The Justice Department has defended its actions, saying it obtained an injunction against one member while dismissing charges against the others "based on a careful assessment of the facts and the law."
But that explanation hasn't satisfied the commission or Republican lawmakers, who say the dismissal could lead to an escalation of voter intimidation.
Three members of the radical group were accused of trying to threaten voters and block poll and campaign workers by the threat of force in November 2008 -- one even brandishing what prosecutors call a deadly weapon.
The three black panthers, Minister King Samir Shabazz, Malik Zulu Shabazz and Jerry Jackson were charged in a civil complaint in the final days of the Bush administration with violating the voter rights act by using coercion, threats and intimidation. Shabazz allegedly held a nightstick or baton that prosecutors said he pointed at people and menacingly tapped it. Prosecutors also say he "supports racially motivated violence against non-blacks and Jews."
The Obama administration won the case in April but moved to dismiss the charges in May without explanation.
After Republican lawmakers pushed in the summer for an internal investigation, the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility obliged, starting a probe that the department has said should conclude before it cooperates with the commission's investigation.
Rep. Frank Wolf, R-Va., announced Thursday that he had inserted language into the annual Justice funding bill that requires the OPR to provide results of its investigation -- a resolution that has been referred to the House Judiciary Committee and must be voted on within 14 legislative days.
"I regret that Congress must resort to oversight resolutions as a means to receive information about the dismissal of this case, but the Congress and the American people have a right to know why this case was not prosecuted," Wolf said in a written statement.
"Time and again over the last year, the department has stonewalled any effort to learn about the decision to dismiss the case," he continued. "I have written Attorney General (Eric) Holder on six occasions asking for an explanation for the dismissal of this case. To date, I have received no response from him."
The commission feels it is being stonewalled, too, and has filed subpoenas with the department for the information as well as to interview career attorneys that handled the case.
"They've never given a satisfactory answer," said Todd Gaziano, a member of the commission and director of the conservative Heritage Foundation's Center for Legal and Judicial Studies. "There is a heavy burden on the Justice Department to explain why those facts in the complaint do not constitute voter intimidation."
When asked about the commission's repeated requests for information, Justice Department spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler said, "We're reviewing the commission's request."
She told FoxNews.com that the civil division at the department reviews "these types of requests in accordance with longstanding guidelines governing the disclosure of internal department information."
The commission is likely to hold a public hearing on the case early next year and could have a report out by September, Gaziano said.
The commissions sent two inquiries into the Justice Department's dismissal of the case in June and received what it called a "largely non-responsive letter" from the Justice Department in July and none of the documents requested. The commission sent another inquiry in August and September when it said it received notification from the Justice Department that it would not provide any information until its internal investigation was complete.
That prompted the commission to issue subpoenas and send its latest missive this month, a response to a Justice Department letter in November that that the commission said challenged its authority to subpoena the department or its employees.
"While your letter refers to an ongoing 'dialogue' between the Department and the Commission, it is the dearth of cooperation on the part of the Department that has resulted in the Commission's need to issue subpoenas," David Blackwood, general counsel for the commission, wrote.
"We are both mindful of the sensitivity of the subject matter involved and aware that, in response to similar requests, the department has raised various concerns and matters of privilege," Blackwood wrote. "While such considerations carry weight, cooperation with commission investigations is a mandatory statutory obligation."
"Moreoever, due to the unique investigative role of the commission -- akin to that of a congressional committee - -disclosure to the commission of the information sought it is both proper and required,' he added.
Wolf said in his written statement that the attorney general has instructed his department to ignore the subpoenas.
"The nation's chief law enforcement officer is forcing these career attorneys to choose between complying with the law and complying with the attorney general's obstruction," he said, adding that one of the attorneys has been compelled to obtain private counsel.
"The House must not turn a blind eye to the attorney general's obstruction," he said. "He has an obligation to answer the legitimate questions of the House and the Civil Rights Commission."
Monday, September 28, 2009
I love it when a plan comes together
So here we are, back to the typical Democrat philosophy, it does not matter if you get results, all that matters is that you say that you will. How you feel about an issue is more important than how you deal with an issue.
No surprise to me or many people that did not vote for Obama, only the people that did vote for him will be surprised when his January deadline comes and goes and does not even make the news.
Kind of like the deadline he gave for cabinet members to cut $100 million from the Federal Budget within 90 days. While that is a pittance in the big picture of Federal Spending it was still something he got his face on TV to brag about being fiscally responsible. Well when the 90 days came up and Gibbs was asked about it, he first had to be reminded what the reporter was talking about, then he answered that it was 100 days not 90 even though there are dozens of news stories from April 20th that say it was 90 days. Well a week or so later they came back and said they had found savings because they were going to do things like use online magazine subscriptions instead of hard copies and jam more soldiers into charter planes. I guess that would save a little money. It would be nice to see a follow up story if they really did any of these things. Because we all know trimming off $100 million while you are adding $3 trillion to the budget is really going to help things out.
Labels: Gitmo, Obama, politics
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
When is a cut actually an increase?
Labels: politics, Pork spending
Tuesday, February 03, 2009
Tax Dodgers
I find it humorous that the leadership of the party that wants all of us to pay more taxes cannot seem to pay their own taxes. First the Treasury secretary, then Tom Daschle makes a $148k mistake, and now the budget and accountablility person has tax problems. This is getting to be absurd.
Friday, January 30, 2009
Obama is he a uniter or not
But the problem is he sounds like Reagan and talks about uniting the country, but many of his actions so far at that of a liberal. There is so much pork and special interest payoffs in this economic stimulus package.
And Obama is trying to micromanage the financial sector now that tax money has gone to bail those people out. Just because we have a stake in the game now does not mean we get to tell the companies how to run their day to day operations. He had Citigroup cancel their corporate jet purchase because they took TARP money. What he did not know was that the order was placed over two years ago and the new jet was going to replace 2 older less efficient jets. So they were doing what he wants by going with a greener fleet, but then he stopped them. And it is going to cost $2 to $4 million to cancel the order. This is what happens when reactionary politicians start micromanging things like wars and companies.
Labels: Economy, Obama, politics
Friday, January 23, 2009
Gitmo and Torture
Why the Gitmo policies may not change
Here are a few of the delays, caveats and loopholes that could limit the impact of Obama’s orders:
1. Everyone has to follow the Army Field Manual—for now…
Obama’s executive order on interrogations says all agencies of the government have to follow the Army Field Manual when interrogating detainees, meaning the CIA can no longer used so-called enhanced interrogation techniques, which have included waterboarding, the use of dogs in questioning, and stripping prisoners.
However, the order also created an interagency commission which will have six months to examine whether to create “additional or different guidance” for non-military agencies such as the CIA.
2. Obama ordered a 30-day review of Guantanamo conditions—by the man currently responsible for Guantanamo.
Waxman pointed out that adhering to the Geneva Condition is “already the law,” and deemed that section of the order “bizarre.”
3. Obama vowed no torture on his watch, but force-feeding and solitary confinement apparently continue at Guantanamo for now.
It’s possible that the 30-day referral to Gates is simply an effort to buy the Obama team time to deal with two Guantanamo practices that some consider torture, or at least inhumane: force feeding and isolation of prisoners. According to detainee lawyers, about two dozen inmates who refuse to eat as a form of protest are currently being force fed, and about 140 are in some form of solitary confinement.
The Bush administration has argued that the feeding is humane and that the solitary, at least as practiced now, is not the kind of total isolation that amounts to torture. “There’s an important distinction to be made between isolation and separation” from other prisoners,” Waxman said.
As far as we know, the force feeding and solitary practices continued onto Obama’s watch.
4. The vast majority of detainees in American custody may see no benefit from Obama’s orders
While Obama ordered a case-by-case review of the 245 prisoners held at Guantanamo, the 600 prisoners held in indefinite American custody in Afghanistan and roughly 20,000 in Iraq won’t get such attention.
5. The orders downplay the possibility that some prisoners might be set free in America.
Obama ordered that when Guantanamo closes, any remaining inmates “be returned to their home country, released, transferred to a third country, or transferred to another United States detention facility in a manner consistent with law and the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States.” But Obama’s wordsmiths seem to have deliberately trimmed out any explicit mention of the explosive possibility of freeing prisoners on American soil.
6. Military commissions are shut down…. for now
One of the attention grabbing provisions of Obama’s orders calls for military tribunals at Guantanamo to be “halted.” But the Obama administration is not ruling out returning to some sort of military forum to deal with some of the prisoners.
Report: Ex-Gitmo detainee joins al-Qaida in Yemen
CAIRO, Egypt – A Saudi man released from Guantanamo after spending nearly six years inside the U.S. prison camp is now the No. 2 of Yemen's al-Qaida branch, according to a purported Internet statement from the terror network.Labels: Gitmo, Obama, politics, torture
Tuesday, November 04, 2008
Media Bias
One example given was that Obama danced with Ellen on her show but McCain got drilled about why he is against gay marriage. Well Obama is against gay marriage too, so why did he get such different treatment. It was pretty much the same deal on the View where Barbara called Obama sexy and Whoopie hugged him and gushed over him. But they acted like hard reporters with McCain.
And on Letterman and Leno there have been something like 375 negative jokes about McCain but only 69 negative jokes about Obama.
And people on the left wonder why Rush or Fox News are so popular. Because conservative people get tired of all the poor treatment by the Main Stream Media. Rush and Fox bring some fairness to the media.
Thursday, June 05, 2008
Funny quote
"Why are you guys in the US even bothering to have an election. On one side you have a lawyer who is married to a lawyer running against a lawyer who is married to a lawyer. On the other side you have a guy who is married to a good looking woman that owns a beer distributorship. What are you guys thinking?".
Labels: funny, politics, quote
Thursday, December 06, 2007
Dennis Kucinich
Anyway as nutty as Mr. Kucinich is, I will give him this, he seems honest and really believes in what he says and stands for. That is way different than most of the other folks running for office these days. He even offered to let Ron Paul be his running mate since Dr. Paul is against the war in Iraq also. The Paul campaign said "No". But give it to Dennis to stir things up.
Now Ron Paul, there is a candidate that would shake things up in the US if he got elected. I agree with a lot of things he has to say, but his pro life stance does not help him with many voters. Although at the worst case he would see it returned to being a state issue. That is the thing with Libertarian minded people they like minimal Federal Government and most things are state issues.
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
Funny News Today
The first one is that Dick Cheney and Barack Obama are distant cousins. How funny is that? We really are a melting pot in the good ole USA.
The second one is that both W and Congress have hideous approval ratings. Here are excerpts from the Reuters story:
Bush's job approval rating fell to 24 percent from last month's record low for a Zogby poll of 29 percent. A paltry 11 percent gave Congress a positive grade, tying last month's record low.
"There is a real question among Americans now about how relevant this government is to them," pollster John Zogby said. "They tell us they want action on health care, education, the war and immigration, but they don't believe they are going to get it."
And I hope that this part is true, but won't likely really have any impact on the final outcome of the election.
The bleak mood could present problems for both parties heading into the November 2008 election campaign, Zogby said.
"Voter turnout could still be high next year, but the mood has turned against incumbents and into a 'throw the bums out' mindset," Zogby said.
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]
