Friday, July 02, 2010

 

Welfare State Coming Home to Roost.

Amazing that nobody was reporting this before the Health Care Bill was passed and signed.  Not really a big shock though to those of us that knew it was going to be a mess.  First insurance premiums are skyrocketing in response to the new law and now the report that one of the things that supporters said would get better is going to actually get worse.


Health overhaul may mean longer ER waits, crowding

In this May 27, 2010 photo, a patient is transferred to Hope Children's Hospital from Advocate Trinity Hospital's emergency room in Chicago. EmergencyAP – In this May 27, 2010 photo, a patient is transferred to Hope Children's Hospital from Advocate Trinity …
RELATED QUOTES
^DJI9,665.78-66.75
^GSPC1,021.77-5.60
^IXIC2,089.82-11.54
CHICAGO – Emergency rooms, the only choice for patients who can't find care elsewhere, may grow even more crowded with longer wait times under the nation's new health law.
That might come as a surprise to those who thought getting 32 million more people covered by health insurance would ease ER crowding. It would seem these patients would be able to get routine health care by visiting a doctor's office, as most of the insured do.
But it's not that simple. Consider:
_There's already a shortage of front-line family physicians in some places and experts think that will get worse.
_People without insurance aren't the ones filling up the nation's emergency rooms. Far from it. The uninsured are no more likely to use ERs than people with private insurance, perhaps because they're wary of huge bills.
_The biggest users of emergency rooms by far are Medicaid recipients. And the new health insurance law will increase their ranks by about 16 million. Medicaid is the state and federal program for low-income families and the disabled. And many family doctors limit the number of Medicaid patients they take because of low government reimbursements.

Labels:


Monday, November 16, 2009

 

Government Run Health Care

And so it starts. We get a taste of what will happen when the government gets to decide what procedures are performed and which procedures cost too much.

New Cancer Guidelines Say to Start Mammograms at 50, Not 40

Monday, November 16, 2009

NEW YORK — Most women don't need a mammogram in their 40s and should get one every two years starting at 50, a government task force said Monday. It's a major reversal that conflicts with the American Cancer Society's long-standing position.

Also, the task force said breast self-exams do no good and women shouldn't be taught to do them.

For most of the past two decades, the cancer society has been recommending annual mammograms beginning at 40.

But the government panel of doctors and scientists concluded that getting screened for breast cancer so early and so often leads to too many false alarms and unneeded biopsies without substantially improving women's odds of survival.


Labels:


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]