Monday, June 01, 2009

 

Government Motors

So we have spent $50 billion on GM with much more going to be spent in the future and for what? They are in bankruptcy, and the UAW will get more control of them. Another union payback from Obama.

I heard today that GM could be Obama's Vietnam, a never ending black hole that money gets poured into but never ends and never gets better. So I thought maybe I should look at this the way the left looked at Iraq. Just think of how many children could have received health care with that $50 billion or how many teachers could have been saved from being laid off. And the $50 Billion does not even count what we are giving to Chrysler or GMAC to save them.

Yes the UAW is now management and labor at two US auto companies. So when they do not get what they want are they going to strike against themselves? Probably not, because with Obama representing the other major owner the workers will always get what they want. And the tax payers will get stuck with the tab.

Labels: , ,


Tuesday, April 14, 2009

 

When is a cut actually an increase?

President Obama said that he would end or severely curtail earmarks from Congress in the Federal Budget process.  Well the "Pig Book" is out on Pork Barrel Spending in the new budget and it is up 15% from last year.  So much for another one of Barack's promises.  Kind of like him saying no lobbyists in the White House and then he appoints some to his staff.  He could have vetoed the budget and sent it back to Congress to clean up, but instead he chose to push it through and then complain about it.  I guess the buck does not stop with this president.  It gets passed.

Labels: ,


Sunday, March 22, 2009

 

Environmentalists Do Not Want Solar Panels

After all the environmentalists complaining about fossil fuels hurting the planet and causing global warming and every other bad thing in the world, we have been relegated to wind and solar energy that a few short months ago everyone was talking about as the savior of the world.  Well in the San Francisco Bay area the environmentalists have previously protested wind farms because they can kill birds with the big blades.  And in the San Diego area they are protesting the power lines that will bring the electricity from a proposed solar panel farm into the city.
So after all the hoopla that we need to get off oil and onto solar, now the Democrats are getting into the anti-solar farm fight.

Senator Dianne Feinstein, who I normally see as one of the more reasonable Democrats in Congress has said no to solar panels in the Mojave Desert.  

WASHINGTON -- California's Mojave Desert may seem ideally suited for solar energy production, but concern over what several proposed projects might do to the aesthetics of the region and its tortoise population is setting up a potential clash between conservationists and companies seeking to develop renewable energy.

Nineteen companies have submitted applications to build solar or wind facilities on a parcel of 500,000 desert acres, but Sen. Dianne Feinstein said Friday such development would violate the spirit of what conservationists had intended when they donated much of the land to the public.

Feinstein said Friday she intends to push legislation that would turn the land into a national monument, which would allow for existing uses to continue while preventing future development.

"It would destroy the entire Mojave Desert ecosystem," said David Myers, executive director of The Wildlands Conservancy.

So the solar projects would ruin the entire desert eco-system.  But the part that they want to put solar panels on is between to other protected areas.  So how could this ruin the entire ecosystem. Typical environmentalist spouting doom and gloom with no science to  back it up.

In a speech last year, Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger complained about environmental concerns slowing down the approval of solar plants in California.

"If we cannot put solar power plants in the Mojave desert, I don't know where the hell we can put it," Schwarzenegger said at Yale University.

You tell them Arnold.

The land lies in the southeast corner of California, between the existing Mojave National Preserve on the north and Joshua Tree National Park on the south.

"They all have to go through a rigorous environmental analysis now," Miller said. "It will be at best close to two years out before we get some of these grants approved."

At least 2 more years of reviewing the permits for the solar panels before any work could start.  This is exactly what was blamed for California's energy crisis a few years back.  The permit process takes so long for anything to get done, that many companies give up or never try.

It is just so frustrating how these people think.

Labels: , ,


Monday, March 02, 2009

 

Toilet Paper an Environmental Threat?!

You cannot make this stuff up folks. First SUVs and now the environmental movement is after toilet paper. I guess they want us to use corn cobs. But then what would we use to make ethanol. The environmental movement seems to want to return to the 1700's which is almost as bad as the Taliban who want us to return to the 1500's. I had to laugh when I read this article.

Fluffy Toilet Paper Said to Be Worse for Environment Than Hummers

Sunday, March 01, 2009

That super-soft toilet paper you're fond of using? It's an ecological disaster, environmentalists say.

Millions of trees are harvested throughout the Americas – including rare old-growth forests in Canada – to sustain the United States’ obsession with quilted, ultra-soft, multi-ply toilet paper, the New York Times reported.

Although toilet paper manufacturers could produce products from recycled materials at a similar cost, the newspaper reported, the fiber taken from standing trees are necessary to help give the tissue its fluffy feel.

“No forest of any kind should be used to make toilet paper,” said Dr. Allen Hershkowitz, a senior scientist and waste expert with the Natural Resource Defense Council told the Times.

The United States is the largest market for toilet paper in the world, the newspaper reported, but tissue from 100 percent recycled fibers makes up less than 2 percent of sales for at-home use among conventional and premium brands.

People from other countries throughout Europe and Latin America are far less picky about what they use to wipe.

“This is a product that we use for less than three seconds and the ecological consequences of manufacturing it from trees is enormous,” Hershkowitz told the Guardian newspaper, which cited the chemicals used in pulp manufacturing and process of cutting down forests.

“Future generations are going to look at the way we make toilet paper as one of the greatest excesses of our age," Hershkowitz said. "Making toilet paper from virgin wood is a lot worse than driving Hummers in terms of global warming pollution.”

However, hope is on the horizon, if Hollywood is any indicator. The Times reported the Academy Awards ceremony last weekend used 100 percent recycled toilet paper at the Kodak Theater’s restrooms.

Labels:


Sunday, February 15, 2009

 

A Close Call
















I had a close call on Wednesday that has made me take a look at my life. During a rain storm as I was heading back to the office a car came across the freeway median on Interstate 5 and nearly hit me. I saw the car coming and was pretty sure he would not get me since I was in the right lane, but he did hit the car in the left lane head on and in the impact they grazed my work pickup as I swerved out of the way. I called in the crash and checked on the drivers and put out traffic cones to close off the lanes and channel traffic to the shoulder. The drivers were taken to the hospital with serious but not life threatening injuries. Modern cars are amazing. Between airbags and crumple zones it is remarkable that neither person was killed.

Here is a newspaper article on the crash.

http://www.redding.com/news/2009/feb/11/i-5-wreck-blocks-traffic-anderson/

Labels: ,


 

Changes to Executive Pay

You cannot make this stuff up folks. I laughed out loud when I read this story this morning. Now that Obama has made a big splash on TV ranting about Executive pay, he seems to be changing his tune. Now honestly I really want this guy to succeed as President, but it is starting to look like amateur hour at the White House. He is looking more like the Dems of old and many politicians on both sides of the aisle as he says one thing but does another. Why didn't he get the bill changed before he agreed to sign it. Did his people not read it first.

Obama better get Congress in line because Barney Frank and Nancy Pelosi and the like think they are the President now. But I cannot believe that Obama is going to sign the bill and then have it changed. It is more about the image than actually doing the right thing and we have too much of that in Washington right now as it is.

White House Considers Changes to Executive Pay Limits Outlined in Stimulus Bill

The Obama administration wants to work with lawmakers to revise portion of spending plan that limits the amount of bonuses executives at financial firms can earn.

WASHINGTON -- Facing a stricter approach to limiting executive bonuses than it had favored, the Obama administration wants to revise that part of the stimulus package even after it becomes law, White House officials said Sunday.

While President Barack Obama plans to sign the $787 billion stimulus bill in Denver on Tuesday, his administration will seek changes in the government's approach to executive compensation, senior Obama adviser David Axelrod said.

Obama press secretary Robert Gibbs, appearing on CBS's "Face the Nation," also said the administration would seek to "strike the right balance" on the compensation question by discussing changes in the provisions with House and Senate members. Asked if Obama would enforce the bill and was satisfied with it, Gibbs replied, "We will sign this bill into law on Tuesday."

"Mr. Gibbs may not like it, but it is going to be enforced," Rep. Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said on CBS. "This is not an option. This is not, frankly, the Bush administration, where they're going to issue a signing statement and refuse to enforce it. They will enforce it."

Labels: , ,


Tuesday, February 10, 2009

 

Chuck Norris for President

At a Road Construction site near my house this week an electronic sign was altered to read "Chuck Norris for President". I think that would be pretty cool to see how the world responded to him as president. The leaders of North Korea or Iran or Russia could watch Missing in Action or Invasion USA to see how we would deal with folks that we do not like. It would be awesome and it would stimulate the economy as kids all across the country would sign up for Karate classes.

Here is the story in the local paper including the pretty poor photo of the sign.

Road Sign Hacked

Tuesday, February 03, 2009

 

Tax Dodgers

What is it with all these Obama appointees and their inability to pay taxes? I know that Democrats do not have the corner on the market with tax problems, but it sure seems that way sometimes.

I find it humorous that the leadership of the party that wants all of us to pay more taxes cannot seem to pay their own taxes. First the Treasury secretary, then Tom Daschle makes a $148k mistake, and now the budget and accountablility person has tax problems. This is getting to be absurd.

Labels: ,


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]